Imr 4350 vs h4350.

Mar 29, 2010 · So well, that it is hard to tell the difference. Groups are excellent and I would be very confident in either one. In fact, I had settled on IMR 4350 based on availability but found...

Imr 4350 vs h4350. Things To Know About Imr 4350 vs h4350.

This method of 1 shot at progressively higher loads tells me little. 3 to 5 shot groups at each load is my preferred method. My method netted me these results. Both H4350, and RL16 loaded from 40 to 43 in both ,all groups were 1" or less. RL16 was tightest with under .5" between 42.1 and 42.3 . 42.3 was .28".Product Details. A stand-out choice for new short magnums, IMR® 4350 powder comes specially designed for use with lightweight or medium-weight bullets. It works superbly with both Remington and Winchester models. Uniformly consistent, this medium- to slow-burn rate propellant delivers enhanced accuracy with every shot.Hodgdon H4350 falls into the medium-slow burn rate category, similar to IMR 4350 and IMR 4451. When choosing a burn rate, you should consider the cartridge, bullet weight, and desired velocity. H4350 is versatile— it has a great burn rate for a wide variety of cartridges. Here at Ultimate Reloader we have seen excellent results with the following:Since your loading ttsx's watch pressure when you get close to max. Happiness is a warm gun and knowing God's love. 4895 was developed as the "government" 30-06's powder has always been the go to for 30-06 along with 4064.bruce hodgdon got his start with this powder designed for 30-06 and used by our military.

It's the clear velocity winner for 6.5 CM compared to H4350, if only by a little. Over 2800 fps with 140/142s (like 100 fps above H4350), and almost as fast as SuperFormance and Hybrid100V for the 147s. What really …

Let us know, gonna be hard to beat RL16 or h4350 to only save 5-8 bucks a lb. hate to be negative but it would be awesome to have another decent option in the mix, on a hungry gas gun prairie dog slayer I’d like a more economical powder choice ... I'd suspect they tried to clone h4350 as close as possible and when they said old tech they were ...Hodgdon H4350 falls into the medium-slow burn rate category, similar to …

Hodgdon H4350 Smokeless Powder. The burning speed of this Extreme Extruded propellant has been known to shooters for decades. Over time, Hodgdon has modernized H4350 by shortening the grains for improved metering and making it insensitive to hot/cold temperatures. H4350 is great in cartridges such as the 243 Winchester, 6mm …22 កញ្ញា 2022 ... ... imr 4350 sportsman's warehouse, imr 4350 temperature sensitivity, imr 4350 temperature stability, imr 4350 uses, imr 4350 vs h4350, imr 4350 vs ...The H is a tiny bit slower, and you'll see that you can go just a bit higher before you see pressure troubles. I have recently done some 30-06 load testing using both of these powders, and found that with 180 grain bullets, 56 grains of IMR 4350 would give me some pressure troubles (enlarged primer pockets, ejector marks on case heads)... whereas my final load of 56.6 grains of H4350 did not ...TreeMutt, IMR4350 and H4350 average so similar that variations in manufacturing lots, or specific cartridge/bullet application, can switch burn-rate. Which is why over the years published loading data has sometimes shown H4350 slower than the IMR4350, and then a few years later the opposite.487. Location. John Day, OR. Trying to find a good load for a new Tikka T3 in .338 win. Really want to get the 230 ELD-X to shoot well. Tried H4350 and found a node at 71 grains moving 2850 FPS. Groups weren’t good when tested at various seating depths. Next I tried 74 grains of RL19 and just loaded some at 74 grains with various seating ...

L. Joined: May 2005. Posts: 6,392. Pikeville, TN. It is close, but not identical to either. I used it with good results for a while before standardizing on H4350. Re: Accurate 4350 vs IMR 4350. kenster99 # 9305568 11/02/14. Joined: Oct 2014.

Let us know, gonna be hard to beat RL16 or h4350 to only save 5-8 bucks a lb. hate to be negative but it would be awesome to have another decent option in the mix, on a hungry gas gun prairie dog slayer I’d like a more economical powder choice ... I'd suspect they tried to clone h4350 as close as possible and when they said old tech they were ...

Hodgdon H4350. Hodgdon H4831. Hodgdon H4831SC. Hodgdon H4895. Hodgdon Hybrid 100V. Hodgdon Retumbo. Hodgdon Varget. Improved Military Rifle IMR 3031 ... Improved Military Rifle IMR 4320. Improved Military Rifle IMR 4350. Improved Military Rifle IMR 4451. Improved Military Rifle IMR 4831. Improved Military Rifle IMR 4895. Improved Military …Recently I've heard from several sources that Reloader 16 is the same as H4350. Just wondering what others know. Also I know that IMR4350 is not exactly the same as H4350 but are the two interchangable?Re: Temp sensitivity of H4350 I guess I'll have to do some testing. I bought a 8 pounder of IMR 4350 last May and haven’t tried it yet. Lately I've been using RE-17 with good results. In years past it always seemed that better velocity was obtained with IMR powders over the same Hodgdon powders and temp sensitivity wasn't an issue for me ...Feb 10, 2009 · Feb 10, 2009. #4. The 2008 hodgdons manuel lists imr 4350 as 91 st on a burn rate scale with h4350 as 92nd, it also lists a starting load for a 180 gr 30-06 as 52 gr h 4350 and 53 gr of imr 4350 .so starting with a low end load should be safe. 300 win mag 180 gr. starting imr 4350 63 gr imr 4350 66 gr.Alex. 3. Last year, top F-Class shooter Rick Jensen did a comparison between H4350 and IMR 4451, shooting the two powder in a wide range of temperatures. His data ...IMR 4350 and H4350 ARE NOT THE SAME POWDER OR ANYTHING …

Dec 26, 2020 · This method of 1 shot at progressively higher loads tells me little. 3 to 5 shot groups at each load is my preferred method. My method netted me these results. Both H4350, and RL16 loaded from 40 to 43 in both ,all groups were 1" or less. RL16 was tightest with under .5" between 42.1 and 42.3 . 42.3 was .28". IMR4350 / H4350. Getting ready to start loading for my new to me 7mm-08. Nosler 120g BT's are the bullets I want to use. Nosler starting load with this bullet is 45g of IMR4350 / 49g max. Nosler has no data for H4350. Hodgdon starting load with the same bullet is 48g of H4350 / 50g max. Hodgdon has no data for IMR4350.Feb 27, 2006. 5,147. 259. Both are great powders Brian. You are correct in that H4350 is supposed to be a bit more temp stable than IMR4350. That being said, IMR4350 is what I use in my 6mm Remington (very close to your .243), and my own 30-06. It has worked very well for me in all conditions from hot weather to extremely cold, way below zero.Posts: 1,753. To summarize what has been said, 4064 and its near twin brother 4895 are mid burning rate powders and more efficient with 150 and 168 bullet weights, while 4350 is a lower burning rate powder and more efficient with the heavier 180 and 200 grain bullets. Note that 47 gr 4895 as well as 4064 are common loadings for the …IMR 4451 and Norma URP shot groups not much larger than 0.5" with low Sds, however, their velocities were nearly 100 f.p.s. slower than H4350. Hybrid 100V pretty much mirrored H4350.ELD 140's and many sub half moa groups to 600 yds - a few at 5/8, very few at 3/4. It was all I used back in the H4350 shortage and really had no complaints. I've since switched to H4350 and RL16 but accuracy and SD's/ES's have stayed about the same. Temp stability is the only gain.Apr 25, 2013 · I have checked other Magnum Rifles for comparison, my Manuals show about a 9-10% reduction for IMR 4831 in a 378 Weatherby with a 270gr. And about a 2-3% Reduction for IMR 4350 vs H4350. Thus my plan is to use the same % in my 375 Weatherby Hodgdon Data. 6.

5,081 28. Apr 14, 2013 #2. Steve, That powder is intended to duplicate the IMR 4350, so I think you'll find that it will serve you well, at about the same charge level that you were using with the IMR version. Work up from a grain or so below the IMR 4350 level you were using, and search for the accuracy node.Re: Hodgdon 4350 vs. IMR 4350 Hodgdon now markets both. The H4350 …

ELD 140's and many sub half moa groups to 600 yds - a few at 5/8, very few at 3/4. It was all I used back in the H4350 shortage and really had no complaints. I've since switched to H4350 and RL16 but accuracy and SD's/ES's have stayed about the same. Temp stability is the only gain.I think this will allow you to tune up the H-4350 charge you tested to match the velocity of the IMR4350. Our rifles and cartridges being totally different perhaps the same logic applies. My rifle shoots equally well with 300gr Game Kings loaded over RL-15, RL-19 or H-4350 when tweaked for 2650fps.787. Location. Arkansas. Mar 12, 2020. #5. I have shooting buddies that have used it... they say charge for charge vs h4350, sw4350 will give lower velocity at the same pressure. Same with precision vs varget. But both gave good accuracy. May also look at long rifle, I believe it is near 4350 burn rate.Two sub .4 moa loads, first load with H4350, 42.1, Hornady brass, federal 210M , and Nosler140 grain Ballistic Tip, coal at 2.768”. Second load identical but with IMR 4350,42.4 gn. Tried IMR 4451, StaBall 6.5, W760, all with several loads each. Could get into .500-.700”, but not sub .5 MOA.Javascript is required. Please enable javascript before you are allowed to see this page.29 កុម្ភៈ 2016 ... IMR 4350 and H4350 are very similar. QuickLoad shows that the difference between the two is pretty negligible (difference of about 4fps). If IMR ...

Probably the best example of this is the slow-burning single-based rifle propellant known as 4350. Available now as the original IMR 4350, Hodgdon’s H4350 and Accurate Arms’ 4350, the potential for confusion is obvious. Other powders sharing this same situation are 4227, 4198, 4895, and 4831.

The Big Country. Jan 28, 2017. #2. 7828 or H1000 is going to give the highest velocity of the three you mention in the .257 Wby. Has to do with expansion ratio or how much powder you are trying to force down a given bore size. Generally, the greater the powder charge (case capacity) to bore size ratio, the slower powders are going to provide ...

Sep 3, 2021 · Sep 3, 2021. #9. Veteran said: Those burn rate charts are relative and qualitative but not quantitative at all. Yes, it shows Accurate 4350 as slower than IMR 4350 and H4350, both if which have a quantitative burn rate of about 0.51. But Accurate 4350 has a numerical burn rate of only about 0.38. The Pennyrile of Kentucky. I finally got around to trying the IMR4350 powder in my 6.5. Loaded up 40 grains with a 120 grain Sierra SP, Hornady brass and a CCI primer. Five shots measured .9 at a 100 yards, very mild shooting load. Then I went up to 41.8 grains, and tried both the Sierra and a 120 Nosler BT.Sep 23, 2016 · Bugger, Both IMR4350 and H4350 vary slightly in burn-rate from lot to lot, but overall I've been using exactly the same charges as IMR4350 since starting to use H4350 at least 15 years ago, with very similar results in both accuracy and velocity in cartridges from the .243 Winchester to .375 H&H. Cannot find H 4350 and have an ample supply of IMR 4350. Ackleyman has a post on here listed under "243 for Northern Whitetails" listing the 100gr Hornady BTSP, 42.3 gr of H4350 and 2muchgun lists 42.3 gr of IMR 4350 for the Sierra 100g BT...same gr. for both weight bullets. Realize these are over max loads for this round that they have …Re: IMR 4350 vs. H4350 in 6.5 Creedmoor Typically H4350 is a tad slower than the IMR variant, but H is more temp stable. IMR isn't too bad on sensitivity, especially compared to the Reloader powders.Hodgdon H4350 Smokeless Powder ( for sale ) Extreme Extruded propellant is a burning speed that has been known to shooters for decades. During that time, Hodgdon has modernized H4350 powder ( in stock ) by shortening the grains for improved metering and making it insensitive to hot/cold temperatures.Mar 14, 2017 · IMR 4451 vs H4350 | Sniper's Hide Forum. Log in Register. Been working up loads with 4451 with pretty good success and getting ready to hop on an 8 lb for $212, Then I found some H4350 8 lb'ers but they want $277 shipped. My mind is saying that is way to flippin expensive but still intriguing. Is it that good or just been the go-to for so long ... Recently I've heard from several sources that Reloader 16 is the same as H4350. Just wondering what others know. Also I know that IMR4350 is not exactly the same as H4350 but are the two interchangable?Aug 5, 2011 · IMR 4350 vs H4350 Jager1 Aug 5, 2011 Aug 5, 2011 #1 Jager1 Beginner Sep 23, 2010 71 0 I was just wondering how these two powders compare. I have an IMR 4350 load worked up for my 300 WSM but would like to try one of Hodgdon extreme powders. Can I consider these two powders the same as far charge weight goes?

I haven't tried H4350 with a 165 gr. bullet as of yet in my 30-06 but two years ago I shot a cow elk with the 165 gr. Nosler AccuBond using W760 and the elk died. Bullet entered in the ribs on the right side and destroyed the left lung. Elk went maybe 30 yards, laid down and died. Rifle FN Mauser custom, 24" barrel.Posts: 1,753. To summarize what has been said, 4064 and its near twin brother 4895 are mid burning rate powders and more efficient with 150 and 168 bullet weights, while 4350 is a lower burning rate powder and more efficient with the heavier 180 and 200 grain bullets. Note that 47 gr 4895 as well as 4064 are common loadings for the …The Pennyrile of Kentucky. I finally got around to trying the IMR4350 powder in my 6.5. Loaded up 40 grains with a 120 grain Sierra SP, Hornady brass and a CCI primer. Five shots measured .9 at a 100 yards, very mild shooting load. Then I went up to 41.8 grains, and tried both the Sierra and a 120 Nosler BT.Instagram:https://instagram. guilford county powerschoolweather in ky3 10 dayseso vvardenfell surveypineapple juice for wisdom teeth reddit Man I love IMR 4350. Ive used it forever in 6x47, 6.5x55, 7WSM and 300 WM. The internet hates it, but it not only shoots well, you can find it all the time while the fanboys are buyin up the H4350! Regards DT virginia state income tax calculatoreva air premium economy seating plan Accurate 4350 in it's current form is made in the IMR plant in Canada, and my current load with it for 30-06 and a 190 grains Nosler is 58.8 grains and that is 2% off of where I found pressure. My H4831 load is 59 grains. So it is quite a bit slower than the other 4350's. working at cvs reddit The powders below are listed in the order of their approximate burning rate, from the quickest powder to the slowest. It is important to trust in a top quality manual when reloading. This chart is only for comparison purposes. This page shows a powder burning rate chart. It shows a comparison between Winchester, Hodgdon, IMR, Accurate, Alliant ...Mar 5, 2020 · ELD 140's and many sub half moa groups to 600 yds - a few at 5/8, very few at 3/4. It was all I used back in the H4350 shortage and really had no complaints. I've since switched to H4350 and RL16 but accuracy and SD's/ES's have stayed about the same. Temp stability is the only gain.